FOR REFERRAL PARTNERS
WHY PROFESSIONALS REFER
Discrepancies require explanation
Scores, observations, and daily functioning point in different directions.
The profile crosses disciplines
Communication may intersect with attention, regulation, language, executive function, and social participation.
Previous evaluations identified pieces
Prior assessments describe parts of the profile, but the central question remains unresolved.
The report guides next steps
Findings inform care, collaboration, planning, and the need for further assessment.
What professionals receive
COLLABORATIVE, NOT DUPLICATIVE
The evaluation is framed to sit alongside psychological, medical, educational, occupational therapy, and school-based information—not to duplicate it. When indicated, findings clarify where additional consultation or diagnostic assessment may be useful.
Referral partners often use BASG when they need:
• Speech-language formulation for a complex profile • Explanation of context-dependent performance • Synthesis across prior findings and daily functioning • Recommendations that support school, home, and treatment planning
COLLABORATION
Bay Area Speech Group works alongside psychologists, physicians, occupational therapists, educational therapists, schools, attorneys, and allied professionals. The evaluation remains within speech-language pathology while identifying where another discipline may help complete the picture.
QUESTIONS THIS EVALUATION CAN HELP ANSWER
Why do standardized scores and everyday functioning differ?
Why does communication change across settings?
What communication demands increase cognitive load?
What role does masking play?
Which findings fall within speech-language pathology?
When is additional diagnostic collaboration appropriate?
ORGANIZED AROUND REFERRAL QUESTIONS
Why does communication access vary so much by setting?
For students who appear verbally capable in one context and inaccessible, avoidant, dysregulated, or depleted in another.
What is being missed when testing looks average?
For profiles where average scores do not explain breakdowns, masking, cognitive load, or participation patterns.
How do overlapping diagnoses affect communication?
For cases involving ADHD, autism, anxiety, language, demand sensitivity, regulation, or complex developmental history.
What information would help the team plan next steps?
For teams needing a clinical formulation to guide school planning, treatment coordination, or further evaluation.
WHEN TO REFER
01
Why don’t standardized scores match everyday functioning?
02
Why does communication vary so much across settings?
03
What explains the discrepancy between observed performance and reported concerns?
04
Would another speech-language evaluation meaningfully clarify the clinical picture?
REFERRAL QUESTIONS
I’m happy to discuss whether a comprehensive speech-language evaluation is the appropriate next step—or whether another referral pathway may better answer the clinical question.
Request a Consultation
© 2026 Bay Area Speech Group. All rights reserved.
Website content, clinical frameworks, written materials, and original language may not be reproduced, adapted, republished, or used for commercial purposes without prior written permission.